Comparing two cannabis tax-base systems: Lessons learned from legal cannabis products sold in Ontario, Canada

  • Bundit Sornpaisarn Centre for Addiction and Mental Health https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-1172
  • Nipun Rifat Farzan Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9997-9513
  • Farihah Ali Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Jean-François Crépault Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Sameer Imtiaz Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Cayley Russell Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Jürgen Rehm Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Keywords: cannabis, marijuana, price, tax, Ontario

Abstract

Aims To examine the price and tax structures of cannabis products sold in Ontario to inform the government on how to improve the policy on the cannabis tax base from a public health standpoint.

Design Economic evaluations to assess price and tax structures of various cannabis products

Setting Ontario

Participants Data of cannabis products sold in Ontario regarding the Ontario Cannabis Store (OCS)’s buy and sell prices and product characteristics, including the product’s type, quantity per package, and quantity of THC and CBD. The OCS provided data on 2,601 units of cannabis products in March 2022. 

Measures Measures examined include the harmonized sales tax, the seller’s markup, the producer’s price, the flat-rate tax, ad valorem tax, effective excise tax, provincial adjustment tax, and excise tax per mg THC. The percentage of each tax compared to the retail price is also calculated.

Findings A flat-rate tax of $1 per gm of 10% THC flower produces a tax of $0.01 per mg THC. Taxing cannabis products based on gm of dried flower results in high-THC products being taxed at a lower rate. Evidence showed that product categories with types and potencies that had lower taxes rates per mg THC imposed upon them had more product varieties.

Conclusions The Ontario government should consider changing the tax base from the current one based on gm of flower to one based on mg of THC. Moreover, indexing the flat-rate tax to inflation is important to prevent the tax’s flat rate from becoming lower over time.

Author Biographies

Bundit Sornpaisarn, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

all detailed affiliations:

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33  Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2S1

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 3M7

Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Thailand, 420/1 Ratchawithi Road, Thung Phaya Thai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10400

Nipun Rifat Farzan, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 3M7

Farihah Ali, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

All detailed affiliations:

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2S1

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 3M7

Jean-François Crépault, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33  Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2S1

Sameer Imtiaz, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33  Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2S1

Cayley Russell, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33  Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2S1

Jürgen Rehm, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

All detailed affiliations:

  1. Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2S1
  2. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 3M7
  3. Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, CAMH, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1R8
  4. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1A8
  5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 8th Floor, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1R8
  6. Program on Substance Abuse & WHO CC, Public Health Agency of Catalonia, 81-95 Roc Boronat St., 08005, Barcelona, Spain
  7. Center for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany Faculty of Medicine
  8. World Health Organization/Pan American Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2S1
Published
2025-03-12
How to Cite
Sornpaisarn, B., Rifat Farzan, N., Ali, F., Crépault, J.-F., Imtiaz, S., Russell, C., & Rehm, J. (2025). Comparing two cannabis tax-base systems: Lessons learned from legal cannabis products sold in Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research, 13(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.533
Section
Article